Do you believe it is better for students to operate before their university study?

Do you believe it is better for students to operate before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, better to write, much easier to read.

PARAGRAPH 1
Practical experience, contacts, at work skills. EG: Studies through the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as likely to find employment…..

PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, opportunity to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students can change their higher education course while at uni….

Many people think that it’s more straightforward to learn something in a combined group in the place of individually. Would you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has several benefits
Elements of teamwork may be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2
Disagree – Individualism is better
Self reliant, own the result, not determined by others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Many people genuinely believe that children should do organised activities in their time that is free while think that children should always be free to do what they want to complete in their leisure time. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting your brain wonder, children can go to town, find themselves essay wrighter, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies also show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it would be unfair to this minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to get
-furthermore studies also show that the brain operates better after a distraction from a structured task such as for example studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Lots of people say that globalisation and the growing quantity of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environment. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your answer. From what extent do you agree or disagree? Use reasons that are specific examples to aid your situation.

PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE SURROUNDINGS
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop for the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…

Scientists think that to be able to protect the environmental surroundings, people must use less energy in their lives that are daily. However, most people have never changed the real way they live. How come you would imagine many people have not taken individual action? What could possibly be done to encourage them to take action?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy of the commons
– Collective problem – easier to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What could be done to cause them to become take action?
– Media campaigns by the us government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……

Some think that could be the responsibility of people to deal with environmental surroundings. Others say it is the national government which should be careful of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should take care of environmental surroundings because:
we have been the consumers, we vote with your wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – consumers are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should look after the environment because:
They have the charged capacity to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
Supposed to be guardians of this country, which means that collectively these are generally guardians associated with the earth… yet not true in reality

Conclusion
Both should always be doing more!

In many countries small shops and town centers are going away from business, because individuals tend to drive into the large out-of-town stores. This results in an increase in car use, plus it ensures that people without cars don’t have a lot of usage of stores that are out-of-town. You think advantages of such development outweigh its disadvantages?

Write My Paper For Me Comments Off on Do you believe it is better for students to operate before their university study?

Share this